The Commercial Imperative
Outer space was once the exclusive domain of governments. Not anymore.
Outer space was once the exclusive domain of governments. But today, commercial companies are increasingly driving space technology development and operation.
Up until the early 1990s, roughly 93% of all satellites in orbit were government-launched. Many were explicitly military assets; every launch was a massive societal undertaking. Around this time, NASA spent about $15 billion yearly, good for 0.2% of US GDP. But over the years, budget numbers shrank, government progress slowed — and commercial industry picked up the mantle.
Private, commercial companies will drive future space exploration and innovation. This is all but a truism nowadays, as less than 13% of the payloads launched in 2024 were government assets. But before this year, this fact was not officially recognized in Pentagon acquisitions rules, rules that often drove program managers to custom-design government systems, rather than looking to the growing and highly-capable commercial markets for existing technology they can leverage to accomplish their missions.
This is why we are encouraged to see the NDAA language establishing a commercial-first mandate for government solutions. It will work to drive innovation, speed, and capability. How am I so certain? Because I have already seen this scenario play out once before.
As a co-founder and the Executive Director of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation from 2008 to 2012, I led the commercial space industry’s efforts to establish NASA’s Commercial Crew Program to replace the aging Space Shuttle. At the time, many argued for building another government-run Space Shuttle replacement, but President Barack Obama made the fateful decision to instead look to private industry. It was an unpopular decision, but it was the right one. It resulted in Americans flying to the International Space Station on American rockets from American soil, and helped American companies, most notably SpaceX, dominate the global launch market. A singular policy choice changed the industry, and cemented American leadership in space.
The US Military now faces the same choice. Space Force has already begun shaking things up, shifting from a handful of massive, decades-in-the-making satellites toward constellations of smaller, more resilient systems. These programs are up and established — perhaps most notably the Protected Tactical SATCOM program to deploy large numbers of small communications satellites in GEO — but these efforts can only succeed if acquisition officers truly put commercial options first and avoid slipping back into their old habits of writing government-unique requirements that slow development cycles, drive risk into technical designs, and increase costs.
Why make the shift to “commercial first” now? Because speed is now a national imperative. The old way of custom-built systems to government requirements will add years to delivery timelines compared to leveraging technology that the commercial industry already has. Worse, they risk sidelining technologies that are already proven in orbit and have existing commercial customers in favor of custom one-offs with only one customer: the government. Commercial systems have been hardened in the best possible crucible: unforgiving free market competition.
There’s also the issue of leverage. By buying commercial systems the US Government gets to benefit from existing production lines and billions of dollars of private investment. And every time the government buys a commercial system, it doesn’t just solve a single problem for a single program, it helps scale an industry that serves allies, international partners, and private users. That creates spillover effects that a bespoke government system simply never will. Commercial-first procurement is not only cheaper and faster, it multiplies American influence and reach.
The reality is this: the commercial space sector is no longer the realm of experiment, it is now the backbone of all modern space activity. The NDAA’s commercial-first mandate reflects that, and it’s encouraging to see Congress and the Pentagon lean in to being a better partner to industry partners. We look forward to supporting that mission, and bringing technology that is working on orbit today to bear for our national defense.
- John Gedmark, Founder of Astranis
More Reading
Building for the 10 Day Challenge
Jason Brown, GM at Applied Intuition
The future of war will be long, technical, and unforgiving. It won’t be decided by a single breakthrough system but by how quickly one side can field networks of AI-enabled systems, autonomous robots, software-driven decision tools, and modern weapons that constantly adapt to changing threats.
Want to bring back American manufacturing? Start here.
Senator Roger Wicker, Katherine Boyle
By cutting red tape and supporting innovation, the Pentagon can jump-start an American manufacturing comeback
US could lose next major war due to Pentagon’s ‘broken’ acquisition system
Senator Tim Sheehy, Katherine Boyle
The United States simply cannot afford to wait until the next war starts to fix our broken acquisition system. We cannot sacrifice our national security on the altar of bureaucracy
American Dynamism on the Podcast
Watch: The Person Who Runs HR For 2 Million Federal Workers
Watch: The Common Thread of All Technology: Monitoring the Situation, Ep.1
Watch: Building Media Institutions in the Short-Form Era: Monitoring the Situation Ep. 2
Views expressed in “posts” (including podcasts, videos, and social media) are those of the individual a16z personnel quoted therein and are not the views of a16z Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. a16z Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell — or a solicitation of an offer to buy — any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.
The contents in here — and available on any associated distribution platforms and any public a16z online social media accounts, platforms, and sites (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) — should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here or on a16z content distribution outlets are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources, including from portfolio companies of funds managed by a16z. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. In addition, posts may include third-party advertisements; a16z has not reviewed such advertisements and does not endorse any advertising content contained therein. All content speaks only as of the date indicated.
Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website — or on associated content distribution outlets — be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles — which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters.
There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available here: https://a16z.com/investments/. Past results of a16z’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. As for its investments in any cryptocurrency or token project, a16z is acting in its own financial interest, not necessarily in the interests of other token holders. a16z has no special role in any of these projects or power over their management. a16z does not undertake to continue to have any involvement in these projects other than as an investor and token holder, and other token holders should not expect that it will or rely on it to have any particular involvement.
With respect to funds managed by a16z that are registered in Japan, a16z will provide to any member of the Japanese public a copy of such documents as are required to be made publicly available pursuant to Article 63 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan. Please contact compliance@a16z.com to request such documents.
For other site terms of use, please go here. Additional important information about a16z, including our Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, is available at the SEC’s website: http://www.adviserinfo.sec.gov